Europe’s top court ruled on Tuesday that Malta’s system for appointing judges aligned with EU standards, in a case which campaigners said had forced the government to carry out reforms. The European Commission has long accused Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban of undermining freedoms of courts, media, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and academics, as well as of violating the law with his restrictive migration policies.
The ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) came after Repubblika, an organisation which campaigns to protect justice and the rule of law in Malta, challenged the country’s system of appointing judges in a national court. That court then sought guidance from the Luxembourg-based CJEU on whether the Maltese system complies with the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights and the CJEU set out the criteria to guarantee judicial independence and impartiality.
The CJEU judges said it was not counter to EU law for a prime minister to appoint members of the judiciary as long as an independent body assessed candidates and gave an opinion.
The Maltese requirement that the prime minister must provide the reasons for choosing a candidate not put forward by the independent body was an additional safeguard, they said. Maltese Prime Minister Robert Abela welcomed the ruling.
“It demonstrates that our reforms have been recognised and our judicial system has been effectively strengthened for the benefit of our citizens,” he said in a tweet.
Campaign group Repubblika said the government would not have carried out the reforms if it had not brought the case in 2019.
“In fact, a week ago, for the first time, judges were nominated for appointment without the government having anything to do with their selection,” Repubblika said.
The ruling, which came amid criticism of moves by fellow-EU members
Poland and Hungary to control judicial appointments,
noted EU states had committed to upholding the rule of law and said they must not undermine the independence of the judiciary.
The CJEU last month backed the right of Polish judges applying to join the country’s Supreme Court to appeal against the opinions of a body which reviews candidates, underlining a rift over the rule of law between the country and the bloc. In reaction to Tuesday’s ruling, Polish Deputy Justice Minister Sebastian Kaleta said the European Commission demands standards of Poland that it does not demand of other countries.
“We will… consistently defend Poland’s right to self-determination,”
he said. “We hope that today’s decision will end this largely non-legal dispute, this political dispute,” he added, referring to Poland’s clashes with the EU over the rule of law.
The European Commission has long
accused Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán
of undermining freedoms of courts, media, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and academics, as well as of violating the law with his restrictive migration policies.
Source: Reuters
please make a donation here
Hot news
Living in Hungary: Insights from expats on what they enjoy and what they don’t
Hungarian government to cap catering service fees
BREAKING – Shocking testimony: the American woman died in Budapest due to BDSM sex gone wrong?
ORbán cabinet: Chinese BYD investment will put Szeged in Europe’s TOP 30
Scientist with Hungarian origins can treat cancer with viruses? The miraculous recovery of Dr Beáta Halassy
PM Orbán talked about the importance of abolishing the EU’s anti-Russia sanctions